Brought to you by Colorado DUI Drunk Driving Defense

Edinburg DWI Lawyers

  1. Alamia, Richard: Felony Domestic Violence Violent Crimes Misdemeanor Violation of Protective Order Criminal Immigration Theft Car accidents Aggravated Assault Weapons Possession Criminal Trespass Assault Evading Arrest Burglary DWI Sealing Juvenile Records DUI Drugs Federal cases (nationwide) Sexual Assault Identity Theft Fraud Arson Expunctions Public Intoxications Public Lewdness Aggravated Robbery Endangering a Child Resisting Arrest Terroristic Threat Criminal Mischief Indecent Exposure Manslaughter Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle
  2. Hernandez, Jesse: Affordable Criminal Defense
  3. Pena, Antonio: Have you been arrested for drunk driving? Is your right to operate a motor vehicle going to be suspended? How will you get to work? How will you keep your job? Or worse, have you been arrested for drug possession? Are you on probation, or on parole? Will you have to go to prison, or pay a fine? What are the penalties, and do you have a viable defense? These area fewof the important questions that people who have been arrested ask themselves . If you have been arrested, or a family member has been arrested, youneed a lawyer who has experience dealing with the court system. Don't leave anything to chance, or in the hands of someone who has not dealt with the criminal process before.
  4. Fabian Guerrero: When a court has ruled that HGN is a scientific test requiring expert testimony, there are two common standards that govern how a prosecutor should lay foundation for HGN evidence. Depending on the state, the prosecutor will be required to meet either the Frye standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence, or the Daubert/Federal Rule of Evidence 702 standard (or a combination of both standards). Under the Frye standard, followed in approximately16 states, the prosecutor must prove that the HGN test is "generally accepted" in the relevant scientific community in order to lay the foundation for the admission of HGN evidence. Under the Daubert/Federal Rule of Evidence 702 standard, also followed in approximately 16 states, an expert may give opinion testimony on HGN evidence only if three conditions are satisfied: 1. Testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; 2. Testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and 3. The witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case. Other states have adopted their own standards for the admissibility of scientific evidence such as HGN, and others have not addressed the issue of admissibility at all.
Return to Texas DWI Lawyers