University of Iowa researcher finds alcohol involvement lead to more devastating farm-equipment crashes

‘There needs to be continued education’

    The crash involving a tractor and reality TV star Chris Soules happened on this straightaway in the 1000 block of Slater Avenue north of Aurora about 8:20 p.m. Monday. (PHOTO BY JEFF REINITZ, Waterloo Courier)

    IOWA CITY — A relatively low portion of accidents between farm equipment and passenger vehicles involve alcohol. But those that do tend to be more dangerous and deadly, according to a new study out of the University of Iowa.

    Karisa Harland, UI adjunct assistant professor of emergency medicine, led the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-funded research from the UI’s Great Plains Center for Agriculture Health.

    She said the hope for the study — published this month in “Traffic Injury Prevention,” a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal — is to educate motorists and farmers and encourage preventive practices.

    “From a farmer perspective, they need to make sure that their equipment is well lit,” Harland said.

    She added making equipment such as tractors and combines more visible could be as simple as “cleaning off your slow-moving vehicle sign so it’s more reflective and replacing it if it’s starting to fade.”

    “From a motor vehicle and passenger vehicle standpoint — obviously there needs to be continued education on the risks of driving while impaired,” she said. “And also on interacting with farm equipment on the roadways.”

    The study comes at an especially relevant time after former reality TV star Chris Soules in April crashed his truck into the back of 66-year-old Kenneth Mosher’s tractor just north of Aurora. Soules, 35, was charged with leaving the scene of a fatal crash, as Mosher died in the collision.

    First responders found empty and partially consumed open alcohol containers in and around Soules’ truck, and he also was seen buying alcohol before the crash, according to court documents. His attorneys reported two urine and blood samples were negative for drugs or alcohol, but authorities said Soules went home after the crash and refused to open the door until law enforcement obtained a search warrant hours later.

    His trial is scheduled for Jan. 18, and he faces up to five years in prison if convicted. Harland, who started her research in 2011 and wrapped it earlier this year, said the case hit the news as she was absorbed in her study and analyzing its findings.

    “If felt like our research was timely,” she said.

    But the Soules case bucked her study’s findings — that odds of an injury or fatality are more than two times higher for passenger vehicle drivers than for those operating the farm equipment.

    “If you have a gigantic combine and a small car runs into it, the car is going to absorb all the energy and therefore that person is more likely to be injured,” Harland said.

    That size difference likely explains why alcohol-related collisions between farm equipment and passenger vehicles — while less frequent than standard vehicle crashes — more often have devastating consequences.

    “If we’re looking at only crashes that involved alcohol impairment, which we had 61 of those, then 75 percent of those 61 had either an injury or fatality,” Harland said.

    Her research analyzed data between 2005 and 2010 from four regional states — Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota, and South Dakota. Researchers found data for 1,971 total on-road farm equipment crashes — with Iowa reporting the most crashes, at 1,023, and North Dakota reported the fewest, at 165.

    But North Dakota reported the highest percent involving alcohol, at 6.1 percent, while Iowa reported the fewest involving alcohol, at 2.4 percent.

    The 61 total alcohol-related farm equipment crashes has them accounting for just 3.1 percent of the total — which is smaller than for standard vehicle crashes. One in 20 of the farm-equipment crashes resulting in injuries, or 5.6 percent, and one in six of the fatality crashes, or nearly 18 percent, involved an alcohol-impaired driver.

    Meanwhile, 30 percent of standard fatal motor vehicle crashes involve alcohol.

    Reasons for the difference could include timing, Harland said, as farm vehicles aren’t on the road as often and aren’t as prevalent at night, outside urgent harvest seasons.

    “Other than in the fall when they’re maybe working 24/7, or the spring my hypothesis would be that the farm equipment is probably not on the road at night when there is more likely to be an alcohol involved crash,” she said.

    But because farmers in this and neighboring rural states do sometimes have to traverse the roads at night, Harland said her research sheds a spotlight on the risk of doing so and the need to improve awareness and prevention efforts.

    “Although these crashes with alcohol are rare, three percent, when it does happen, there are severe consequences,” she said.

    http://www.thegazette.com/subject/news/education/higher-education/university-of-iowa-researcher-finds-alcohol-involvement-lead-to-more-devastating-farm-equipment-crashes-20171220

    Drunken man attempts to pick up DUI suspect from police station

    Police double-checked the person who finally picked up the two hadn’t been drinking. (Source: Brown Deer Police/WISN/CNN)

    Police double-checked the person who finally picked up the two hadn’t been drinking. (Source: Brown Deer Police/WISN/CNN)

    BROWN DEER, WI (WISN/CNN) – A woman arrested in Wisconsin for first offense drunken driving called a friend to pick her up at the police station, but that friend showed up drunk.

    When the man arrived at the Brown Deer Police Department, he became the subject of an investigation after officers smelled intoxicants on his breath.

    That suspicion triggered field sobriety tests that were administered right in the police station’s lobby.

    The tests didn’t go well, and the man was arrested for operating a vehicle while intoxicated.

    “Fortunately, sometimes a poor decision is followed up by somebody else’s poor decision when they’re trying to help,” Officer Nick Andersen said.

    Police double-checked that the person who finally picked up the pair of OWI suspects from the station had not been drinking.

    “Today with the call a friend, Uber, Lyft, taxi, there’s so many options out there that there’s really no excuse left,” Andersen said.

    http://www.tucsonnewsnow.com/story/37116883/drunken-man-attempts-to-pick-up-dui-suspect-from-police-station

    Simulator aims to help police test whether a person is too high to drive

    The new year will mark the official start of recreational marijuana sales in California, and there are fears it could lead to more impaired driving. Among U.S. drivers killed in crashes who tested positive for drugs, more than a third in 2015 had used marijuana.

    At the University of California San Diego, researchers are trying to help police detect whether a person is too high to get behind the wheel.

    ctm-1220-recreational-pot-ucsd-driving-test.jpg
    At the University of California San Diego, researchers are using a simulator to help police detect whether a person is too high to get behind the wheel.CBS News

    When you drive on Marcotte’s simulator, he’s not checking how good a driver you are – but how bad a driver you may become high on pot.
     
    “The idea of the off ramp is actually something that the police suggested to you,” CBS News correspondent Barry Petersen said.

    “Because in their estimation, that’s one of the areas that are most difficult for impaired drivers to handle,” Marcotte responded.
     
    The real test subjects light up, some with a real joint, others with a placebo. Then they are put through the simulator challenges like deciding whether it’s safe to drive through a yellow light. They also face a multi-tasking test: finding the right circle.

    It’s all designed to eventually create a tool, perhaps a tablet test, that police can use roadside to determine if someone is too stoned to drive.

    “The ultimate outcome is to see whether or not we can really help law enforcement separate those people who are impaired due to cannabis or those people who may have cannabis in their system and are not impaired,” Marcotte said.

    Unlike alcohol, there is no accepted marijuana breathalyzer. Blood tests can be inconclusive depending on when the test is taken. To make it more complicated, pot affects different people differently.

    “There are indications that the more experienced you are, the more tolerance you develop,” Marcotte said.

    “So a person who smokes a lot might actually have less effect when it comes to driving?” Petersen asked.

    “That’s correct. Because their body is adjusted to it, they know what to expect,” Marcotte said.

    California Highway Patrol’s Sgt. Glen GlaserJr. teaches officers how to recognize a driver under the influence.

    “How much does this end up making a kind of a judgment call, if that’s the right word?” Petersen asked.

    “Well, I think it very much is a judgment call because we want our officers only arresting people who are impaired,” Glaser said.

    Right now officers mostly rely on subjective observations like walking the line and “is there a pot smell in the car?”

    While a lot of Californians are looking forward to January 1 when recreational marijuana goes on sale, Glaser and police across the state are braced.

    “The big scare is going to be those people who are going to try for the first time come January 1 and not knowing how it affects their body,” Glaser said.
     
    One day, the simulator may lead to an answer and help catch someone impaired by pot before getting too high gets someone hurt.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/california-recreational-weed-driving-high-ucsd-test/

    LAPD cop hit by DUI vehicle: Major injuries as 405 freeway shut

    A Los Angeles police officer was seriously injured when a man allegedly driving while impaired crashed into his patrol SUV on the shoulder of the San Diego (405) Freeway while he was outside the vehicle conducting a traffic stop on another motorist, authorities said Tuesday.

    The crash occurred at 11:47 p.m. Monday on the northbound freeway near Santa Monica Boulevard, California Highway Patrol Officer Tony Polizzi said.

    The officer had just pulled over the driver of a Honda Accord for alleged speeding, and he was outside his 2014 Ford Explorer SUV, which was parked behind the Honda, when a 2003 Infiniti Q35 crashed into the SUV, which then struck the officer, the CHP reported.

    The officer, whose name was not released, suffered a “major” injury, the CHP reported. According to reports from the scene, the officer suffered a serious leg injury. He was hospitalized in unknown condition. An LAPD spokesman declined to provide a condition report, citing privacy concerns.

    “It was a close call,” CHP Officer Vance Perreira told reporters at the scene. “Any time you operate on the right shoulder of the freeway, it’s never safe.”

    Perreira said CHP officers were driving in the area a short time after the crash occurred.

    “They said it could have been about … a minute after it happened,” Perreira told ABC7. “They passed by, were first on scene, rendered aid, possibly saved his life.”

    CHP officers arrested the driver of the Infiniti, 34-year-old Douglas Donovan of Woodland Hills, and booked him on suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs, the CHP reported. He was not injured.

    The driver of the Honda also was not injured.

    All northbound lanes were closed until about 6 a.m., when two lanes were re-opened, the CHP reported. By about 7:30 a.m., all but one northbound lane had been re-opened. The remaining lane was re-opened a couple of hours afterward.

    Anyone with information on the case was urged to call the West Los Angeles Area CHP office at (310) 642-3939.

    https://mynewsla.com/crime/2017/12/12/lapd-cop-hit-by-dui-vehicle-major-injuries-as-405-freeway-shut/

    Christmas Party

    Christmas Party Bj’s Brewary

    Monday, Dec 18, 2017, 6:00 PM

    BJ’s Restaurant & Brewhouse
    1690 28th Street Boulder, CO

    24 Members Attending

    Happy Holidays WordPress Peeps!After almost 5 years of leading the WordPress meetup, I have decided its time to pass the baton to Angela Bowman (AskWPGirl.com). As most of you know Angela teaches classes at BDA, and she has been co-organizing the WordPress Builders Meetup for the past three years. This meetup is designed for people who build WordP…

    Check out this Meetup →

    Checkpoints don’t violate amendment in most cases, officials say

    Percentages of crash deaths involving alcohol or speed
    The International Traffic Safety Data and Analysis Group reported in 2015 that the United States, among 19 countries, has one of the highest percentages of crash deaths involving alcohol or speed.

    WHO Global Status Report on Road Safety, 2015. IRTAD Road Safety Annual Report, 2015.

    TAHLEQUAH, Okla. — In 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that if they’re conducted properly, sobriety checkpoints do not constitute illegal search and seizure, in most states.

    The decision held that the interest in reducing alcohol-impaired driving was sufficient to justify the brief intrusion of a properly conducted sobriety checkpoint.

    “We understand that some think checkpoints violate the Fourth Amendment,” said Tahlequah Police Chief Nate King. “However, both Oklahoma Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court have found that checkpoints are legal.”

    Checkpoints are used randomly to check primarily for sobriety and driver’s license and insurance verification. Most states, including Oklahoma, allow sobriety checkpoints, during which suspicious drivers are subject to sobriety tests.

    The Daily Press recently conducted a Facebook Forum wherein it asked citizens what they thought about the legality of random checkpoints.

    “I don’t mind DUI checkpoints because I feel there is no excuse for impaired driving,” said Brandon Eubanks. “Drunk driving constitutes what I think of as a crime against the community. However, using them as random search points and running ID, I am not nearly as OK with.”

    According to guidelines passed by the Tahlequah City Council on Oct. 3, 2005, the TPD may conduct random driver’s license and safety stops to check driver’s license and mechanical condition of vehicles. Officers are expected to be alert for other violations of the law. It reads: “Officers shall use care and good judgment in placing checkpoints at locations that will not endanger the public or the officer.”

    Night checks will be conducted at the supervisor’s discretion, and officers shall follow guidelines in accordance with federal, state and municipal laws.

    Some citizens believe authorities use checkpoints as a form of harassment.

    “I’ve had too many friends and family have this used as a reason to harass them and throw them on the ground, because small-town cops and brown people… pretextual stops have been used forever as ‘reasonable suspicion,'” Izzy Rayovac said on Facebook. “When you get pulled out with a gun to your head while your 5-year-old is in the car watching, just because of the way you look, you tend to think a bit differently. If using the checkpoint as a pretext for stop is finally made unlawful, then I’d feel safe with DUI checks. There is no accountability these days and until there is, it’s not worth the risk.”

    According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, a sobriety checkpoint is a predetermined location at which law enforcement officers stop vehicles to check whether the driver is impaired. They either stop every vehicle or stop them at some regular interval, such as every third or 10th vehicle.

    “While performing checkpoints, we have to have some type of pattern where we randomly stop every other car, stop every car, and so on,” King said.

    At sobriety checkpoints, law enforcement officials evaluate drivers for signs of alcohol or drug impairment at certain points on the roadway.

    Oklahoma Highway Patrol Troop C, Lt. Bill Golden said each department has its own policies to follow on how to perform checkpoints. Checkpoints performed by the OHP Troop C must have a minimum of two officers, be conducted in a safe area, and receive supervisor approval.

    The CDC stated the purpose of checkpoints is to deter driving after drinking by increasing the perceived risk of arrest. To do this, checkpoints should be highly visible, publicized extensively, and conducted regularly.

    Cherokee County Undersheriff Jason Chennault said while the sheriff’s office doesn’t typically participate in checkpoints, sobriety checkpoints have to be publicized before they are conducted.

    The U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported in 2016 that there were 10,497 drunken driving deaths across the nation.

    OHP Lt. Golden said while performing random checkpoints, the OHP typically checks for vehicle defects, driver’s license and security verification, and sobriety.

    “DUI arrests are high in Cherokee County, particularly during the summer,” he said.

    The CDC reported that sobriety checkpoints can potentially prevent nearly one out of 10 DUI-related deaths, reducing impaired driving crashes and deaths by a median of 9 percent.

    “Checkpoints do help reduce the amount of impaired driver’s,” King said.

    NHTSA defines a sobriety checkpoint as the stopping of vehicles, or a specific sequence of vehicles, at a predetermined fixed location to detect drivers who are impaired by alcohol or other drugs.

    For instance, while conducting a checkpoint in 2015, TPD, OHP and the Cherokee Nation Marshal Service arrested Nicholas Ryan Renfro, 25, after observing he had “exaggerated reflexes” and displayed signs of impairment.

    He was arrested for possession of a controlled dangerous substance, driving while under the influence of drugs, possession of drug paraphernalia and possession of more than $1,300 in counterfeit bills.

    According to Oklahoma statutes, any person operating a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol or any other substance, shall be subject to a fine of not less than $100, not more than $500, not more than six months’ imprisonment or a fine and imprisonment.

    Upon conviction, the Department of Public Safety shall suspend that person’s driving privilege. The first suspension would be for 30 days.

    King said TPD has participated in at least five checkpoints this year, but he could not determine how many citations were issued.

    http://www.normantranscript.com/oklahoma/news/checkpoints-don-t-violate-amendment-in-most-cases-officials-say/article_193d01f4-7ef3-518b-bd66-a2111fc6216d.html