However, we need to remember that on any given day, more than 100 people
die on our roadways, and while these deaths do not make headline news, they are no less important. We accept them as the cost of mobility, but they are all preventable.
Tragically, the factors that may have contributed to this crash — speed and lack of occupant restraint use — are incredibly common
. Compound these common factors with an improperly licensed driver who was operating a vehicle that failed an inspection just last month, as New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo noted Monday, and we create a perfect storm
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) will conduct a thorough investigation to identify each contributing factor, and the Board will make recommendations to improve the safety of limousine riders. Notably, we do not yet know all the facts surrounding the crash and the tragic deaths of the victims.
When it comes to stretch limousine construction and oversight, there is an element of Frankenstein involved. Many of these vehicles are modified
after original construction. States have different regulations, requirements and capabilities, and there is no one-stop shop for consumers to determine whether a limousine they are riding in is safe.
We need to close these gaps if we want to ensure the integrity of the vehicles, but equally important is consistency in qualifying drivers, who are tasked with chauffeuring people who, in many cases, opted for a limousine because they did not want to drive impaired.
The National Safety Council strongly encourages people to arrange alternative transportation like limousines if they know they will be celebrating. Alcohol-involved crashes continue to claim nearly 10,000 lives
each year, and no amount of alcohol
is safe to drink if you are planning to drive. That said, we cannot undercut a good safety choice with a poor one. Operators should provide occupant restraints for every seating position, and if you are in a limousine — or a ride share vehicle of any kind — it is imperative to buckle up, even in the back seat.
In many cases, lack of restraint use may not be a choice. Some limousines may not have seat belts available
. While the vehicle carrying 18 passengers on Saturday was a 2001 Ford Excursion, “over-the-road” buses were required to have seat belts
on all new construction beginning in 2016, and passenger cars have been required to have three-point seat belts
in all seating positions for many years. This represents yet another gap in safety.
Seat belts are the cheapest and most effective tool we have to save lives on the road, so no vehicle should operate without them. And it is the responsibility of passengers to use them. Passengers report a nearly 20 percent drop off in rear seat belt use when riding in a ride-share vehicle or taxi, according to a 2017 NSC public opinion survey.
Meanwhile, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety estimates that the risk of serious injury goes up eight-fold
for unrestrained passengers in the back, while over 40%
of all occupant fatalities continue to be unbelted.
New York, in particular, has notable passenger protection gaps in its laws. Despite being the first state to pass a mandatory seat belt law
, New York still doesn’t require
all passengers to wear them. New York earned a C
for road safety on the 2017 National Safety Council State of Safety report, in part because it does not require adults to buckle up in the back seat.
We cannot let tragedies like the one in Schoharie pass us by without doing something about it. Limousines can be a smart way for us to travel and a great choice for people who are celebrating. But there are risks we can and should address. Today many are outraged, but the key is turning that indignation into action tomorrow.