Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Speeding Drunk Driver Threatened To Urinate In Squad Car

Speeding Drunk Driver Threatened To Urinate In Squad Car: Cops

RIVERSIDE, IL — A Chicago woman was arrested after speeding 54 mph over the limit in Riverside, police said. Corina Dominguez, 25, was charged with aggravated speeding, DUI and numerous other traffic violations.

An officer on patrol at 4:23 a.m. Sunday, Dec. 9 saw a car traveling at a high rate of speed northbound on First Avenue at Forest. According to police, the car was first clocked at 78 mph in a 35 mph zone, but the car accelerated to 89 mph in the 35 mph zone. When the officer tried to stop the car, Dominguez accelerated to 100 mph before pulling over at 31st and First.

Police said the officer approached the vehicle and asked Dominguez for her license. The officer smelled a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage coming from the mouth of Dominguez and saw she had bloodshot eyes and slurred speech. She was asked to exit the vehicle and perform roadside standard field sobriety testing, which she failed.

On the way to central booking Dominguez told the officer, “If you don’t release me without charges, I’m going to urinate in your squad.” Police said she also offered additional unsolicited
information that she had been drinking all night and bar hopping and that she had been drinking vodka at Midway Mules all evening and then decided to drive home to Summit. Dominguez was driving northbound on First Avenue, not southbound to Summit. It was also found that she did not live in Summit.

Police said Dominguez’s criminal history includes retail theft, trespass to property, aggravated
battery to police officer, assault and battery.;_ylt=AwrXnCcPqRNcGBwAmHnQtDMD;_ylu=X3oDMTBzdmVvZmlwBGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMxMAR2dGlkAwRzZWMDc3I-

Drunk driver involved in wreck said ‘stranger’ was driving his SUV

Driver had previous DWI conviction in 2016

Police charged Jesus Ponce, 31, with Intoxicated Assault. The wreck happened on Friday, December 7, 2018 shortly after 8 p.m. on the 2100 block of Montwood. 

Police said the victim, identified in court documents as 51-year-old Jose Vasquez, said his Jeep broke down. Vasquez said he turned on his vehicle’s emergency lights and lifted the hood while he tried to restart his Jeep. Vasquez “was in and out of his vehicle attempting to get it started again and only remembers waking up on the ground in severe pain,” the criminal complaint states.  The court document further states Vasquez suffered a pelvic fracture and internal bleeding – “life threatening injuries that required immediate surgery.”

Police accuse Ponce of crashing his Nissan Armada into Vasquez’s Jeep, causing Vasquez to be thrown from the Jeep. A driver who witnessed the aftermath of the wreck told police he saw Ponce in the driver’s side seat of the Nissan Armada, looking for something inside the vehicle. Ponce, the witness claimed, then exited the Nissan Armada and ran away from the scene of the wreck, the criminal complaint states.

The Nissan Armada Ponce was allegedly driving the night of the wreck.  

The court document states Ponce later returned to the scene of the wreck and told police he is the owner of the Armada, but a “stranger” was the one driving the SUV. Ponce allegedly told the officers at the scene, that after he got out of work that evening, he drank a beer at the Pockets bar in West El Paso, two beers at Coconuts in Central El Paso and two shots and a beer at Zocalo in East Central. 

Ponce told police he did not want to drive and a “stranger offered to drive him home.”  The plan was to order an Uber ride for the stranger once they arrived at Ponce’s home. Ponce “stated they stopped at a Whataburger to order food, and as they were driving home, all he remembers is being hit.”  Ponce said the stranger driving his SUV told him to get out of the vehicle and walk around so Ponce “could throw up.”

Ponce, the document states, told police he could not drive because he had a suspended driver’s license and he had not driven in “forever.”  When the officer asked Ponce how he got to work that day, Ponce allegedly said he drove the Armada to work. 

The Jeep Ponce allegedly rear-ended with the Nissan Armada.  

Police told Ponce that a witness identified him as the driver of the Armada after it collided with the Jeep, but Ponce remained adamant he was not driving the Armada when it collided with the Jeep. When the officer asked Ponce about the injury to his nose, Ponce said he “had a bad habit of not wearing his seatbelt.”

Ponce allegedly refused to perform a field sobriety test because he was not the driver of the Armada, police said. Police arrested Ponce for alleged DWI and ordered him to take a breathalyzer test. “The defendant (Ponce) provided a breath specimen that resulted in a .161/.178,” the criminal complaint states.

Ponce had a previous DWI conviction in April 2016, the criminal complaint states.

Cannabis Chocolate Bars Landed This Pilot in Trouble. He’s Now in the DC Circuit.

Jeffrey O. Siegel was flying a Lancair Evolution plane, like the one above, when he made an emergency landing in Kansas. Credit: Wiki commons 

Shortly after takeoff Oct. 1 2016, Jeff Siegel encountered a problem in the skies over Kansas: His airplane’s engine failed, forcing the pilot to make an emergency landing on a road near the small town of Iola.

The Lancair Evolution single-engine plane suffered heavy damage, but neither Siegel nor his passenger were seriously hurt. The Kansas State Highway Patrol, called to the scene, found a briefcase onboard that would ultimately put Siegel on the radar of federal officials.

Inside were three chocolate bars labeled “Lab tested to 100 mg of THC,” a reference to tetrahydrocannabinol—the psychoactive chemical in cannabis.

Siegel soon received a notice from the Federal Aviation Administration saying his private pilot certificate would be revoked. Months later, in February 2018, the FAA’s acting administrator issued an emergency order formally revoking Siegel’s private pilot certificate. According to the FAA, Siegel had not demonstrated the “degree of care, judgment, and responsibility required of the holder of an airman certificate.”

Siegel was not alleged to have been under the influence of cannabis, and his passenger—now his wife—later claimed she had packed the chocolate bars without his knowledge. He faced a drug possession charge in Kansas that was later dropped.

His challenge to the FAA’s penalty is set to come before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Wednesday morning, in a case that muddles transportation safety rules with the tension between states and the federal government over the lawfulness of marijuana.

Siegel’s lawyer, Greg Winton of the Annapolis-based Aviation Law Firm, said the case is the first he’s aware of involving the revocation of a pilot certificate over “simple possession” of cannabis, as opposed to trafficking. Winton is set to argue in the D.C. Circuit before a panel of three judges: Sri Srinivasan, Gregory Katsas and David Sentelle.

DC Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas is on the panel that will hear Siegel’s case. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi / NLJ 

In court papers, Winton has argued that the FAA ignored mitigating factors—such as the fact that the chocolate bars were purchased legally, “apparently in Colorado”—and went against agency policy with such a stiff punishment. A suspension, Siegel has argued, would better fit the offense.

Winton has also argued that Siegel inadvertently took flight with the cannabis-infused chocolate bars.

“It wasn’t intentional. It wasn’t deliberate. And it wasn’t reckless,” Winton said in an interview. “Suspension is the appropriate sanction, I think, in that circumstance.”

An FAA spokeswoman declined to comment on the case but said the agency “has been consistent in its position that marijuana is a ‘significantly impairing’ drug with respect to operating an aircraft.”

➤➤  Get the latest cannabis lawyering, compliance and commentary straight to your inbox with Higher Law, a new briefing. Learn more and sign up here.

Even with the revocation of his certificate, Siegel, a Utah resident who runs his own health and nutrition company, will be allowed to reapply for one early next year. He is pressing his case to avoid having the revocation on his record and go through a full recertification process.

The Justice Department, representing the FAA, has argued that the agency’s administrator and National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) have broad authority to revoke certificates when pilots are found to have flown with marijuana or narcotic drugs onboard. The government’s lawyers have noted that, while the chocolate bars might have been purchased in Colorado, federal law continues to prohibit possession of cannabis regardless of where it is bought or consumed.

The NTSB “rightly found it immaterial that the drugs might have been procured in Colorado: regardless of any state’s law, ‘it remains illegal under Federal law to possess this controlled substance and transport it on an aircraft within the national air space,’” Justice Department attorneys wrote in a D.C. Circuit brief, adding that Siegel’s punishment was consistent with the board’s precedent.

Under the Trump administration, the Justice Department has adopted a toughened stance—at least on paper—toward state-legalized marijuana. In January, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions withdrew guidance issued under the Obama administration that called for a hands-off approach to marijuana that was legal under state law.

At the NTSB, Siegel found one official who agreed that a lighter punishment was warranted.

In his appeal of the administrator’s emergency license revocation, Siegel went to an in-house judge at the NTSB, where his wife testified that she placed the chocolate bars in the briefcase without Siegel’s knowledge.

The judge lowered Siegel’s penalty to a 90-day suspension of his private pilot certificate, drawing a distinction between his case and a case two years earlier involving 200 pounds of marijuana that were found on an airplane.

“Guess what the sanction was? Revocation,” the administrative law judge said, referring to the earlier case. “How is that consistent with what we’ve got here today?”

“This was a simple possession of a substance that was purchased legally, apparently in Colorado,” the in-house NTSB judge said. “There wasn’t any use involved. There wasn’t any transporting for commercial purposes involved.”

Siegel and the FAA’s acting administrator both appealed to the full NTSB, which reinstated the revocation of the certificate.

Man arrested three times in 10 days

Lake Hallie man arrested three times in 10 days

A Lake Hallie man was arrested three times between Nov. 29 and Dec. 8, adding more charges to a rather long list.

Scott M. Weidler, 36, was arrested for misdemeanor battery, drug possession, child neglect, bond violation and fleeing and operating a vehicle while intoxicated.

Charges in these arrests have not yet been filed according to online court records.

Weidler is already waiting trial on a July 2017 charge of felony possession of methamphetamine and misdemeanor domestic abuse in Eau Claire County. The trial is scheduled to begin in February.

He has several other cases still open, mostly for felony bail jumping, and has numerous convictions on his record, mostly for operating while suspended and operating without insurance.

According to a release from the Lake Hallie Police Department:

At 11:45 p.m. on Thursday, Nov. 29, Lake Hallie officers were dispatched to 11928 35th Ave. for a reported disturbance. Weidler was arrested for battery.

Two days later, at approximately 1:20 a.m., officers came to the same address for a reported medical issue. During the call, officers learned of illegal drug violations. A warrant was obtained, and evidence was seized. Weidler was arrested for violation of a no contact bond, possession of drug paraphernalia, felony bond violation, child neglect due to drug use and possession of methamphetamine.

At 1:28 a.m. Saturday, Dec. 8, a Lake Hallie officer spotted a white Chevy Suburban, driving at a high rate of speed, fail to stop at a stop sign at the intersection of 30th Avenue and Cty. Hwy. OO. The vehicle increased its speed as the officer pursued in an attempt to make a traffic stop.

The vehicle fled to 11298 35th Ave., and the driver — identified as Weidler — tried to get into the residence. He was arrested for fleeing and operating a vehicle while intoxicated. He was also arrested for violating felony bond from previous offenses.

Weidler was in custody at the Chippewa County Jail according to a jail roster posted Monday.

Former MPD officer sentenced to 30 days in jail for OWI with child in car

Former MPD officer sentenced to 30 days – A former Madison police officer was sentenced Friday to jail time for driving while drunk with a child in the car, according to court records.

Kelly Hoeft was sentenced to 30 days in jail with Huber. Her license was revoked for 14 months, and she is required to have an ignition interlock device for 14 months.

Hoeft pleaded guilty in October to first-offense operating while intoxicated with a passenger under the age of 16. A charge for operating with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration with a minor in the vehicle was dismissed.

A criminal complaint said someone called 911 after seeing Hoeft’s car plow through some road signs in August 2017. Her blood alcohol content was 0.27 and she had a child in the back seat, according to court documents.

Morris Minor drivers are Britain’s worst for drink-driving

A study from more than six million car insurance quotes over the last 12 months, covering 139 car marques, has found that criminals aren’t driving Range Rovers any more. Rather, the MoneySupermarket analysis claims Britain’s worst offenders for driving while under the influence of drink or drugs are owners of the humble Morris Minor.

According to the report, four out of every 1000 Minor custodians claimed a drink or drug driving conviction over the past year. With an estimated 19,000 examples still on British roads, it means that on average 760 Morris Minor owners have taken the risk of driving while intoxicated or under the influence of drugs.;_ylt=AwrXnCeXtgtcNh8AGgXQtDMD;_ylu=X3oDMTByMXM3OWtoBGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwM4BHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzcg–

Drinking at Home – and Driving Later

friends drinking in kitchen during party

Although we associate drunk driving with drinking at restaurants and bars, drinking at home is also a big problem when it comes to cars.

A new study from analysts at the Prevention Research Center (PRC) at the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE) says that drinking at home is strongly associated with driving after drinking and impaired driving. In fact, it may account for about a third of all drunk driving events.

drunk driving two car crash on road

The researchers, whose work appeared in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol & Drugs, based their conclusions on a telephone survey of 8,553 Californians age 18 and older. Respondents were asked questions about where and how much they used alcohol in the previous month, whether they had driven a car within four hours of drinking, and whether they had driven after they felt they had drunk “too much” to drive safely. (Each respondent decided how much was “too much.”)

Drunk driving prevention programs should look beyond those who drink in bars or restaurants.

Surprisingly, the results of the study indicate that far more people drink frequently at home and far fewer people drink less frequently at restaurants and bars. 73% of drinking occasions were in the home while only 9% were at restaurants, 5% at bars, and 5% at private parties.

The study — conducted by a group led by Dr. Paul Gruenewald, PIRE’s Scientific Director — suggests that drunk  driving prevention programs should look beyond those who drink in bars or restaurants. ‘”Prevention in place’ is the new mantra for modern environmental prevention programs,” Gruenewald said. “Our ability to use social media and other methods to reach out to drinkers in all environments can be extended to encourage safe drinking practices in the home and other contexts.”

The Prevention Research Center (PRC) of PIRE is one of 16 centers sponsored by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), of the National Institutes of Health, and is the only one that specializes in prevention.

Woman fatally overdoses on eve of OUI trial

RI-Bound School Bus Crashes Into Woods Off Route 24

AMESBURY – A local woman scheduled to go on trial Tuesday on her third charge of driving while under the influence of drugs died the night before of an overdose inside her Macy Street apartment, according to Newburyport District Court records.

Norma J. Hutchins, 57, was charged in May 2017 with OUI drugs, negligent operation of a motor vehicle and a marked lanes violation after abruptly stopping her car near Route 110 Liquors.

But the night before she was to appear in court with her attorney John Bjorlie, Hutchins was found by friends unconscious and not breathing in her bathroom. A police report indicates the officer believes the overdose was a result of heroin or fentanyl.

According to a police report, Amesbury police officers Shawn O’Brien and A.J Pesci, along with Amesbury paramedics responded to the Sandalwood Pointe complex around 5:05 p.m. Monday.

When they arrived they found a woman performing CPR on Hutchins as she lay on her back on the bathroom floor. Amesbury firefighters took over resuscitation efforts but soon pronounced Hutchins dead, according to O’Brien’s report.

The woman performing CPR arrived at Hutchins’ apartment a few minutes earlier to check on her. When the friend couldn’t get inside the locked apartment she contacted a condominium trustee who opened the door. He and the friend found Hutchins hunched over in the bathroom and not breathing.

Amesbury police Detective Sean Leary and a state trooper from the Crime Prevention and Control unit were called to the scene to investigate. It didn’t take long for Leary to find white powder on a nightstand next to Hutchins’ bed along with a cut straw next to it.

“Two corner baggies of a white powder substance I believe to be heroin/fentanyl were located in the top nightstand drawer,” O’Brien wrote in his report.

Word of Hutchins’ death quickly spread within a Newburyport District Court room Tuesday morning after Bjorlie told law enforcement officials and other defense attorneys of his former client’s fate.

A few minutes later, Hutchins’ name was called by the court clerk and the charges formally dismissed after Judge Peter Doyle was informed of her death.

In regard to the driving under the influence charge, on May 4, 2017, around 2 p.m. a witness saw Hutchins driving erratically on Route 110 before she pulled the car onto a curb near Route 110 Liquors. When Amesbury police Officer Craig Lesage arrived, Hutchins was nodding off, the car was still in drive but her foot was off the accelerator.

Lesage quickly determined Hutchins was under the influence while behind the wheel. She was so confused that she had trouble untangling herself from her seat belt and then nearly fell on the ground. Lesage later found a prescription pill bottle on the front passenger seat containing a narcotic pain reliever, according to his report.

Surf icon arrested on suspicion of DUI drugs

PIPELINE MASTER: Bruce Irons acknowledges the crowd after receiving his trophy during his induction into the The Surfers’ Hall of Fame in Huntington Beach in 2007. Irons was arrested on Npv. 22, 2018, by Newport Beach Police on suspicion of DUI. (File photo, Orange County Register/SCNG)

Big-wave Hawaiian surf icon Bruce Irons was found asleep in a running vehicle at a Newport Beach gas station and arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence, according to police.

Irons was seen in the early morning hours of Thanksgiving, on Nov. 22, at 8:18 a.m. at a 76 gas station on Pacific Coast Highway, said Heather Rangel, a spokeswoman for the Newport Beach Police Department. “Someone called it in that they couldn’t wake the person up,” she said. “We knocked on the window several times.”

The arrest happened at about 11:22 a.m. after police believed the 39-year-old surfer was under the influence of drugs. Irons was inducted into the Surfers’ Hall of Fame in Huntington Beach in 2007, his name set in cement among other surf legends.

Surfers Hall of Fame inductee Bruce Irons of Hawaii. Handout

He was a fierce competitor in his heyday during the 2000s, with a win against Kelly Slater in the 2001 Pipeline Masters and a stand-out performance and win at the 2004 Eddie Aikau Big Wave Invitational.

Irons, who grew up in Kauai, is known for his fearless approach to surfing big waves. In 2005, he was ranked 9th on the world championship tour, according to the World Surf League.

His older brother Andy Irons, a three-time surfing champion, had a long battle with drug use and died in 2010 at age 32, a tragic end to one of surfing’s most beloved characters who was 11-time world champion Slater’s only true rival.

Bruce Irons surfs his 100-point wave en route to winning the Quiksilver In Memory of Eddie Aikau Big Wave Invitational at Waimea Bay, Hawaii, on December 15, 2004. (File photo by Kevin Sullivan, The Orange County Register/SCNG)


Irons spoke about his brother’s drug use during their younger years in the film “Andy Irons: Kissed by God” made by a Laguna Beach filmmaker and released earlier this year

“He was definitely living it up, and he was also paying the price,” Irons said in the film. “I would hear a lot of stuff, I wouldn’t be with my brother, it would just be a fight. I was trying to stay away from him. I was still trying to get through school.”

In a more recent interview with Huntington Beach forecasting, Irons talked about grappling with his brother’s death.

“I just try and balance the lows of sadness … and I do get my tears out, you know. But I have to try and stay positive,” Irons said in the article. “Happiness attracts happiness and darkness attracts darkness. And I believe that whatever you put out is what you get back.”

In an interview with TMZ, Irons said he’s confident he will beat the DUI drug allegations against him, calling it a “hiccup in the road” and saying he’s “innocent until proven guilty”.


Surf icon Bruce Irons, whose brother Andy died from overdose, arrested on suspicion of DUI in Newport Beach

Michigan’s adult-use marijuana law takes effect Thursday.

The wait is nearly over for Michigan residents eager for the state’s new adult-use marijuana law to take effect.

On Thursday, just 30 days after state voters said yes to Proposal 1, a lot of what’s been illegal about marijuana suddenly becomes legal in Michigan.

But what exactly happens? Here are answers to key questions about recreational pot in Michigan:

So on Dec. 6, I can legally own and use pot in Michigan?

Yes, if you’re in Michigan and are 21 or older, you can possess up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana anywhere, anytime, said Josh Hovey, spokesman for the Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol. That means you could legally have it in your car, or in your bag if you drop by the courthouse on business.

But you cannot consume it in your vehicle or in public. Using pot in a public place is prohibited, as is smoking it where it’s prohibited by whoever owns or manages the property.

And while you can have up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana, no more than 15 grams of it can be in the form of a marijuana concentrate.

Also, the new law will allow you to possess up to 10 ounces of marijuana in your home. Any amount over 2.5 ounces must be locked away.

Where will I be able to buy marijuana?

Nowhere yet, not until retail shops open sometime in 2020.

Until then, the law allows one adult to give for free up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana to another adult. Also, if you live in Michigan, you will be able to grow marijuana in your home as of Thursday.

Adult-use retail marijuana shops probably won’t open until the first quarter of 2020, according to David Harns, public information officer with the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.

Business license applications will be available by Dec. 6, 2019, Harns said.

The law was written to facilitate adding retail cannabis onto medical marijuana businesses, in order to speed setting up the retail system, according to Hovey.

Some medical marijuana provisioning centers could open in nearby towns like Niles and Buchanan before 2020, but they would be open only to registered Michigan patients.

And whether those potential medical cannabis locations or different businesses would be able to sell adult-use marijuana would be up to the cities.

What’s the news about opting out?

Niles City Council already voted to opt out of retail marijuana sales for the time being, while Buchanan delayed a possible opt-out vote. Niles Charter Township board is expected to discuss the issue, but it’s unclear when.

If a municipality does not want adult-use marijuana businesses, the board or council has to vote to opt out of the law, Matt Bach, director of communications for the Michigan Municipal League, said.

This is the opposite of the medical marijuana commercial business law, which required municipalities to opt in if they wanted to allow the businesses.

The new adult-use law indicates municipalities could have up to a year from the law’s effective date to opt out before retail businesses might start applying for licenses, but it’s a little fuzzy.

Bach said the municipal league is advising its 520 members to consult with their municipal attorneys and decide what’s right for their town.

Niles Charter Township Supervisor Jim Stover said that since the township does not allow medical marijuana businesses, it might opt out of allowing retail marijuana businesses as well. He said the issue will be discussed before a vote is taken.

“Our lawyer hasn’t said it [opting out] must be done immediately,” Stover said.

Can I possess and use pot in Michigan if I live in Indiana?

Yes, according to Hovey. As long as you are 21 or older and are in Michigan, you can legally possess up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana, and you can consume it, if you are not in a public place. So don’t light up in your car or in the park. When retail marijuana shops open, you’ll be able to buy at them, too, even if you are a Hoosier, as long as you can prove you’re 21 or older, Hovey said. Remember, though, that as soon as you cross the state line back into Indiana, it is illegal to possess or consume marijuana.

What about driving?

Driving under the influence of an intoxicating substance is illegal, and if your driving is impaired, police say you could be arrested, in Michigan or Indiana.

Will old pot charges be dropped?

Maybe, maybe not. County prosecutors have discretion on what to do and many are exercising it differently.

In Kalamazoo County, for instance, the prosecutor is dismissing pending cases where the alleged crime becomes legal under the new pot law.

But in Cass County, Prosecutor Victor Fitz says he will not dismiss any pending cases because the law is not retroactive.

Berrien County Assistant Prosecutor Steven Pierangeli said his office will not dismiss any current charges even after the law takes effect. Charges will be handled on a “case-by-case basis seeking a just result,” according to Pierangeli.

Can I grow it at home?

Yes. The new Michigan law allows you to grow up to 12 cannabis plants in your home. That means a maximum of 12 plants per household, not 12 plants per adult. The 12 plants are not included in the 10-ounce home possession limit, Hovey said.

Lush Lighting, south of Niles, carries agricultural supplies and equipment to cultivate all types of plants. Owners Matt and Renae Johnson are marijuana legalization advocates and can offer advice on growing cannabis.

Matt Johnson said the business has seen a 20-percent jump in sales since Proposal 1 passed on Nov. 6. But he also thinks most people who’ve wanted to grow marijuana probably already are doing so by being registered under the existing medical marijuana law.

A place like Lush Lighting can sell you the tools to start growing, but it can’t sell you the plants or seeds.

If someone is looking to start legally growing their own plants at home, then they need to know someone who already has the plants or seeds and see if the person will give them a few, according to Hovey.